Master of Arts in Organizational Leadership and Management

Permanent URI for this collection

https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11951/806

Browse

Browsing Master of Arts in Organizational Leadership and Management by Issue Date

Filter results by year or month
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Analysis of the Sudan Conflict: A Case Study of Darfur and Nuba Mountains
    (Uganda Christian University, 2023-09-26) Hamid Muhager
    This research analyzed the Sudan conflict: Case of Darfur and Nuba mountains. The research was guided by the following objectives; To assess how centralization of power has caused the conflict in Nuba Mountains and Darfur, To evaluate how economic and social inequalities lead to the conflict in Nuba Mountains and Darfur, To find out how the Islamization of the Sudan is responsible for the conflict in Nuba Mountains and Darfur and to assess how the Arabization of the Sudan is responsible for conflicts in Nuba Mountains and Darfur. A descriptive design was employed which gave the respondents opportunity to openly state their opinions about the phenomena under the study. 120 respondents participated in this study, both qualitative and quantitative approaches were used. The researcher employed two methods to collect data, that is self-administered survey questionnaire and key informant Interviews. The researcher used questionnaires to gather information from the selected respondents and analyzed by use of SPSS version 23 and thematic analysis was used to analyze qualitative data. The findings reveal that there are governance issues in Sudan as represented by 90% responses. 100% and 95% respondents said there is abuse of human rights and no power sharing respectively and there is no decentralization of power (85%) in Sudan. There is discrimination against the people of Nuba and Darfur regions as represented by 70% responses; key positions at the local levels for governors, commissioners, police, military and judiciary are taken up by people from other regions. This is supported by 95% respondents affirming that there is imbalance in allocating government employment. 100% of the respondents agreed that Government uses the sharia law in its administration of justice and power irrespective of citizens religious diversity and that the education system is religious biased (100%). Centralization of power has affected the government- citizens relationship and it is one of the causes of conflicts in the Darfur and Nuba Mountains. To have peace in the Nuba Mountains and Darfur, decentralized governance would be the ideal solution. There is need for talks, negotiation and arbitration between the people living in Darfur and Nuba mountains and government if lasting peace and sustainable development is to be achieved.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Centrality of Minority Languages in Development Programs: Analysis of How Aliba, Gimara and Reli Languages of North Western Uganda can be Considered Central in Language Development Programs
    (2023-10-24) Reuben Ngosa Kabwe
    This study analyzed why Aliba, Gimara, and Reli languages have not been considered central in language development programs. The central research question was “Why are Aliba, Gimara and Reli languages not considered central in the language development programs? The specific objectives of the study were; To find out how the useability; survival, distinctiveness; and representation of the Aliba, Gimara and Reli ethnic groups contribute to their consideration in languages development programs. The research adopted an action research design using a qualitative research design, based on descriptive approaches. A sample of 218 respondents were considered for the study although data was collected from 195 respondents selected using Morgan and Kreigie sampling tables. Findings on useability showed that Aliba, Gimara and Reli are spoken in their communities, that is in their homes, worship places, markets, and other public places. However, these minority languages have been suppressed and submerged by the prestige languages in the region even when they are being used. These languages risk extinction if not considered central in language development programs. On survival, it was clearly noted by the researcher that most respondents from Aliba, Gimara and Reli indicated that they had never seen or read anything written in their own languages. For many years Aliba, Gimara and Reli people have not received the necessary help to intentionally engage in activities that grow their language and culture.On distinctiveness, findings showed that Aliba, Gimara and Reli are distinct languages that need to be considered as such and not as minor or dialects to bigger languages. Alibas are proud to identify themselves as such and therefore speak Aliba at home and outside of their homes. This is the same with Gimara and Reli as shown in the study findings. On representations, it was found that Reli, Aliba and Gimara are not adequately represented on language development platforms because they are usually subdued and overshadowed by the majority languages that make them feel inferior. At the national level they are not yet scheduled in the constitution as indigenous languages in Uganda. On use ability the study recommends that development partners should initiate possible programs to develop orthographies which will enable these languages to come up with alphabets of their languages and also develop language writing systems. On distinctiveness, the study recommends that an initiative be taken to submit a formal request to the government seeking to be officially recognized as distinct indigenous languages on the national language identification list. On survival, the study recommends that the Church and development partners should begin efforts to translate scripture in these languages to enable the people to read and worship God freely in their indigenous languages. On representation, the study recommends that the different forums in which Aliba, Gimara and Reli people are found should be given adequate representation to articulate their needs as opposed to depending on views from majority languages who do not support their inclusion in language development.