Academic publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Browse

Recent Submissions

Now showing 1 - 5 of 55
  • Item
    A National Framework for Sustainability of Health Knowledge Translation Initiatives in Uganda
    (Uganda Country Node of the Regional East African Community Health Policy Initiative, 2014-05-26) Robert Basaza; Alison Annet Kinengyere; Nelson Sewankambo
    This report is intended to inform the deliberations of those engaged in developing policies on sustainability of health knowledge translation initiatives policies as well as other stakeholders with an interest in such policy decisions. It summarizes the best available evidence regarding the design and implementation of policies on how to advance sustainability of health knowledge translation initiatives policies in Uganda’s [mainstream] health system. The purpose of the report is not to prescribe or proscribe specific options or implementation strategies. Instead, the report allows stakeholders to consider the available evidence about the likely impacts of the different options systematically and transparently.
  • Item
    Willingness to Pay for Community Health Insurance Among Taxi Drivers in Kampala City, Uganda: A Contingent Evaluation
    (Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 2019) Robert Basaza; Elizabeth P Kyasiimire; Prossy K Namyalo; Angela Kawooya; Proscovia Nnamulondo; Kon Paul Alier
    Background: Community Health Insurance (CHI) schemes have improved the utilization of health services by reducing out-of-pocket payments (OOP). This study assessed income quintiles for taxi drivers and the minimum amount of premium a driver would be willing to pay for a CHI scheme in Kampala City, Uganda. Methods: A cross-sectional study design using contingent evaluation was employed to gather primary data on willingness to pay (WTP). The respondents were 312 randomly and 9 purposively selected key informants. Qualitative data were analyzed using conceptual content analysis while quantitative data were analyzed using MS Excel 2016 to generate the relationship of socio-demographic variables and WTP. Results: Close to a half (47.9%) of the respondents earn above UGX 500,000 per month (fifth quintile), followed by 24.5% earning a monthly average of UGX 300,001–500,000 and the rest (27.5%) earn less. Households in the fourth and fifth quintiles (38.4% and 20%, respectively) are more willing to join and pay for CHI. A majority of the respondents (29.9%) are willing to pay UGX, 6,001–10,000 while 22.3% are willing to pay between UGX 11,001 and UGX 20,000 and 23.2% reported willing to pay between UGX 20,001 and UGX 50,000 per person per month. Only 18.8% of the respondents recorded WTP at least UGX 5,000 and 5.8% reported being able to pay above UGX 50,000 per month (1 USD=UGX 3,500). Reasons expressed for WTP included perceived benefits such as development of health care infrastructure, risk protection, and reduced household expenditures. Reasons for not willing to pay included corruption, mistrust, inadequate information about the scheme, and low involvement of the members. Conclusion: There is a possibility of embracing the scheme by the taxi drivers and the rest of the informal sector of Uganda if the health sector creates adequate awareness.
  • Item
    Assessment Uganda Health System Pre-assessment Report 2016
    (United States Agency for International Development/Uganda, 2016-08) Sebastian Olikira Baine; Robert Basaza; Beth Ann Pratt
    The 2011-2015 USAID/Uganda Country Development Cooperation Strategy (CDCS 1.0) hypothesized that a structurally sound, well-resourced, functioning health system, supporting access to quality service delivery is essential to ensuring effective utilization of health services and subsequently, to improving health outcomes in Uganda (USAID, 2010). Therefore, as USAID/Uganda approaches the end of implementation of CDCS 1.0 and in preparation for the next CDCS, it is important to understand the changes that have occurred in the elements of the system and elements that currently comprise Uganda’s national health system, the relationships and interdependencies between these elements, and the fiscal, political, economic, social, and multi-sectoral factors and stakeholders that influence and impact the system’s functionality. The World Health Organization defines a health system as “all organizations, people and actions whose primary intent is to promote, restore or maintain health,” the purpose of which is to improve access and coverage of responsive, efficient, effective, equitable, and quality-driven health services (WHO, 2000). To this end, a health system is supported by a set of basic building blocks - including human resources, financing, information systems, medical supply chains, governance mechanisms, and ervice delivery structures - linked to quality assurance mechanisms, all of which serve to uphold the health sector’s responsibility and accountability to both patients and their communities (Figure 1). For diagrammatic purposes, health systems frameworks often present these building blocks as parallel, stand-alone pillars. In practice, however, elements of a health system are mutually derivative and reinforcing.
  • Item
    Players and Processes Behind the National Health Insurance Scheme: A Case Study of Uganda
    (BMC Health Services Research, 2013) Robert K Basaza; Thomas S O’Connell; Ivana Chapčáková
    Background: Uganda is the last East African country to adopt a National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS). To lessen the inequitable burden of healthcare spending, health financing reform has focused on the establishment of national health insurance. The objective of this research is to depict how stakeholders and their power and interests have shaped the process of agenda setting and policy formulation for Uganda’s proposed NHIS. The study provides a contextual analysis of the development of NHIS policy within the context of national policies and processes. Methods: The methodology is a single case study of agenda setting and policy formulation related to the proposed NHIS in Uganda. It involves an analysis of the real-life context, the content of proposals, the process, and a retrospective stakeholder analysis in terms of policy development. Data collection comprised a literature review of published documents, technical reports, policy briefs, and memos obtained from Uganda’s Ministry of Health and other unpublished sources. Formal discussions were held with ministry staff involved in the design of the scheme and some members of the task force to obtain clarification, verify events, and gain additional information. Results: The process of developing the NHIS has been an incremental one, characterised by small-scale, gradual changes and repeated adjustments through various stakeholder engagements during the three phases of development: from 1995 to 1999; 2000 to 2005; and 2006 to 2011. Despite political will in the government, progress with the NHIS has been slow, and it has yet to be implemented. Stakeholders, notably the private sector, played an important role in influencing the pace of the development process and the currently proposed design of the scheme. Conclusions: This study underscores the importance of stakeholder analysis in major health reforms. Early use of stakeholder analysis combined with an ongoing review and revision of NHIS policy proposals during stakeholder discussions would be an effective strategy for avoiding potential pitfalls and obstacles in policy implementation. Given the private sector’s influence on negotiations over health insurance design in Uganda, this paper also reviews the experience of two countries with similar stakeholder dynamics.
  • Item
    The Cost of Routine Immunization Services in a Poor Urban Setting in Kampala, Uganda: Findings of a Facility-Based Costing Study
    (Journal of Immunological Sciences, 2018-07-03) Isaiah Chebrot; Annet Kisakye; Brendan Kwesiga; Daniel Okello; Diana Kiiza; Eva Kabwongera; Robert Basaza
    Background: Reducing infant and under-five mortality by use of cost-effective strategies like immunization continues to be a challenge, particularly in resource limited settings. Strategic planning for immunization requires credible costing information to estimate available funding, allocate funds within the program and avoid funding shortfalls. This study assessed the total and unit costs of providing routine immunization in health facilities in Kampala. Methods: This was a retrospective descriptive cost analysis study that applied a bottom-up, ingredients-based costing methodology which identified costs from the perspective of the health service providers. The cost of providing immunization services in health facilities in Kawempe Division in the financial year 2015/2016 was determined using relevant data which was collected using an Excel questionnaire adapted from the CostIt software of the World Health Organization. The analysis was also based on the same CostIt software. Results: The average total facility immunization costs were USD 14,415.1 with a range of 8,205.3 at private for profit to USD 47,094.9 at public health facilities. Vaccines and supplies were the main cost driver accounting for 63.6% followed by personnel costs at 24.0%. Routine facility based immunization had the highest cost with an average of 47.9% followed by outreach services at 32.3%. The average cost per dose administered was USD 1.4 with a range of USD 1.0 in larger health centres (HCIV) to 1.5 in HCIII (medium-sized HC or dispensary). The average cost per DPT3 immunized child was USD 20.0 with a range of USD 12.6 in HCIV to 22.0 in HCIII. The findings show a great variance between facility ownership and levels. Conclusions: The study found that the recurrent costs were significantly higher than capital costs and this was across all facilities. Vaccines and personnel costs were the two main cost drivers. Routine facility based immunization was the costliest activity followed by outreaches with social mobilization being the least. The cost per dose administered and DPT3 immunized child were dependent on outputs with high output health facilities having less unit costs compared to facilities with less out outputs. Private health facilities had higher unit costs compared to publicly owned health facility.