Evaluation of Agricultural Waste-Based Briquettes as an Alternative Biomass Fuel for Cooking in Uganda

dc.contributor.authorOmino Joseph Oteu
dc.contributor.authorSarah Kizza-Nkambwe
dc.contributor.authorJunior Senyonga Kasima
dc.contributor.authorMaxmillan Mpewo
dc.contributor.authorMiria Frances Agunyo
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-13T14:49:55Z
dc.date.available2025-11-13T14:49:55Z
dc.date.issued2025-11-13
dc.descriptionJournal Article
dc.description.abstractWood fuel has been adopted as a feasible alternative to cooking energy sources in efforts to replace fossil fuels. However, the exorbitant use of wood fuel has raised concern as it is the major cause of forest cover loss in Uganda. Briquettes have recommended as as sources of cooking energy potential to to substitute wood fuel. Unfortunately, sawdust, a product of deforestation, is the primary material used in making briquettes in Uganda. This instead augments the problem of fuel-induced deforestation. Agricultural wastes could potentially be converted into briquetting materials for generation of cooking energy, although these are studied in in Uganda. Thus, this study study established potential of agricultural wastes as alternative briquetting materials for use in cooking. Four fuel types: charcoal from Mangifera indica, firewood of Eucalyptus grandis, carbonized and non-carbonized briquettes from agricultural wastes, all from within Mukono District were used for the study. Laboratory based experiments were used to determine the physico-chemical characteristics of the fuels. Data were analysed using R software, Ver. 4.2.3. Carbonised briquettes’ mean performance measures were higher than conventional fuels (p≤0.05) and non-carbonised briquettes. The amount of energy required to attain experimental boiling point of water was higher (p≤0.05) in conventional fuels and non-carbonised briquettes than in carbonised briquettes. Duration to boil 5 litres of water was least with the conventional fuel sources. All the fuel sources’ emissions exceeded the maximum range recommended for indoor carbon monoxide levels. However, the particulate matter emission was lower in carbonised briquettes and charcoal than the other fuel sources. Agricultural waste-based carbonised briquettes could effectively be used as an alternative cooking energy source in Uganda. The study recommends conducting cost-benefit analyses on the use of agricultural waste-based briquettes as cooking energy sources.
dc.identifier.citationOmino, J. O., Nkambwe, S. K., Kasima, J. S., Mpewo, M., & Agunyo, M. F. (2024). Evaluation of Agricultural Waste-Based Briquettes as an Alternative Biomass Fuel for Cooking in Uganda
dc.identifier.uri10.37284/2790-9638
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11951/2033
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEast African Nature & Science Organization
dc.subjectBiomass Fuels
dc.subjectBriquettes
dc.subjectCharcoal
dc.subjectEnergy
dc.subjectWood Fuel
dc.titleEvaluation of Agricultural Waste-Based Briquettes as an Alternative Biomass Fuel for Cooking in Uganda
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Evaluation of Agricultural Waste-Based Briquettes as an Alternative Biomass Fuel for Cooking in Uganda.pdf
Size:
613.75 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: