Master of Business Administration
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11951/803
Browse
Browsing Master of Business Administration by Author "ALUR VICKY"
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item INTERNAL CONTROL SYSTEMS AND ACADEMIC QUALITY ASSURANCE IN PRIVATE HIGHER INSTITUTIONS OF LEARNING: A CASE OF EPISCOPAL UNIVERSITY- SOUTH SUDAN(Uganda Christian University, 2025-10-14) ALUR VICKYThis study examined the effect of internal control systems on quality assurance in higher education, with a particular focus on Episcopal University in South Sudan. This research focused on the Control Environment, Information Management, and Monitoring components of Quality Assurance because it recognized the significance of internal controls on quality in higher education. A cross-sectional research design was employed, utilizing a quantitative approach that consisted of structured questionnaires administered to university employees. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 27, and correlation (r) as well as regression analysis were used to assess the relationship between the study variables. The results showed that Monitoring had a stronger positive correlation with Quality Assurance (r = 0.838, p < 0.01) and was also the most significant predictor in the regression model (β = 0.659, p < 0.001). This shows that regular supervision, structured feedback mechanisms, and performance evaluations enhance quality assurance outcomes. Likewise, Information Management showed a strong positive correlation with Quality Assurance (r = 0.745, p < 0.01) and a major effect in regression analysis (β = 0.365, p < 0.001), underscoring the role of efficient data management and communication systems in maintaining academic standards. However, Control Environment exhibited a weak but significant negative correlation with Quality Assurance (r = -0.157, p = 0.019), signifying that exceedingly rigid internal controls may hinder institutional adaptability and innovation. Ultimately, the study revealed that effective monitoring and information management systems helped institutions of higher learning to excel in quality assurance. Universities ought to consider structured assessments in the evaluation process, invest in digital information systems, and maintain internal controls alongside institutional adaptability. Furthermore, accountability must be prioritized in policy making and implementation while ensuring flexible decision making. There is need for a further investigation on the long-term effects of internal controls on institutional performance and academic quality.
